The phenomenon illustrates the dynamics of systematic lying as a mechanism to avoid feelings of inadequacy.
ANALYSIS OF THE PHENOMENON
● Systematic lying arises when an individual chooses fabrication instead of admitting ignorance in most interactions.
● The behavior reveals a pattern where knowledge is used as a symbolic shield against potential rejection.
● The repetition of falsehoods creates an atmosphere of both charm and danger 😶.
● The practice appears inconsistent, since the person occasionally admits “I do not know” without distress.
● This inconsistency shows that the core motive is not inability but the fear of losing approval.
● The lies are directed toward impressing others, especially when affection or admiration is at stake 📘.
● The interaction generates ambivalence: the liar is perceived as likable but also untrustworthy.
● Compassion arises because the need to lie suggests an inner insecurity rather than malice.
● Fear coexists with empathy, since constant deception erodes the foundations of confidence 🕰️.
● The mixture of affection and distrust illustrates how relational dynamics become fragile under sustained dishonesty.
INSTITUTIONAL AND LEXICAL CONTEXT
● The concept of “systematic lying” is defined as a recurrent behavioral strategy where falsification is the default response, and its etymology combines the Greek “systema” (organized whole) with the Old English “lyge” (false statement).
● The notion of “shield” in this context is technical, denoting a psychological mechanism of defense, with etymology from Old English “scild” (protective cover).
● The term “bonding” designates the emotional connection that motivates the liar to preserve proximity, with etymology from Old English “bindan” (to tie).
● The lexical element “inadequacy” signifies a state of perceived insufficiency, from Latin “ina-” (not) and “adequatus” (equal to).
● The institutional relevance lies in how such behaviors are studied within psychology and sociology, where lying is classified as a protective mechanism rather than a pathological symptom.
● Academic frameworks emphasize that the definition of terms allows precise distinction between defensive strategies and deliberate manipulation 🔎.
● The presence of recurrent falsehoods is interpreted as an institutional signal of fragile self-esteem rather than an intentional strategy of harm.
● The etymological clarity of each technical term strengthens the capacity to analyze the phenomenon within formal discourse.
● The institutional approach highlights that recognition of fear, compassion, and insecurity forms part of the interpretive framework 🏛️.
● The structure of systematic lying is presented as a socially mediated pattern rather than an isolated personal defect.
My Diary - Leonardo Cardillo 