Key Findings
The support ticket numbered 414871 concerned a fine received on 17 August 2025 at 07:56 on the N218 Groene Kruisweg near Heenvliet (Gemeente Nissewaard). The fine amounted to €66 issued by CJIB. The issue raised was that the Flitsmeister application did not provide a speed camera warning despite the radar being active. The affected individual stated that the application was updated, and GPS/data were active at the time. The license plate involved was anonymized here. Flitsmeister Support, represented by Samenda van Flitsmeister, acknowledged the message on 12 September 2025, apologized for the late response, and confirmed that several speed cameras are currently visible in their system on that road. They expressed regret about the fine but explained they could not retrospectively determine why no warning had been issued.
Confirmed Facts
- On 26 August 2025, a message was sent to Flitsmeister Support reporting that on 17 August 2025 at 07:56 a traffic fine of €66 had been issued by CJIB on the N218 Groene Kruisweg near Heenvliet in Gemeente Nissewaard. The fine occurred despite the radar being active and the Flitsmeister application being updated with GPS/data enabled.
- The details provided included anonymized license plate information, the exact date and time of the fine, the location specified as N218 Groene Kruisweg near Heenvliet, and two attached screenshots as supporting evidence. The purpose of the request was to understand why the app did not alert about the speed camera and whether the radar would be corrected in the system.
- On 27 August 2025, a follow-up inquiry asked for an update on the status of ticket #414871, again specifying the road and the issue with the missing speed camera alert. The message was signed with the full name of the affected individual, which is anonymized here.
- On 12 September 2025, Samenda van Flitsmeister responded to ticket #414871. The reply apologized for the delayed response, expressed regret about the fine, and stated that it was difficult to determine retroactively why a warning had not been given. It was confirmed that several speed cameras were visible on that road in the system at that moment, but no additional technical details could be provided. The response concluded with an offer to assist with any further questions and a weekend greeting.
- The correspondence shows that Flitsmeister acknowledged the ticket and confirmed the existence of speed cameras in their system for the relevant road, but no explanation or rectification of the specific incident was provided.